About the alleged negative behavior of Jesse Nickles

Forum Homepage Forums LittleBizzy Defamed Us About the alleged negative behavior of Jesse Nickles

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
  • #93 Reply

    Empathy for Others:

    The author expresses sympathy for others who have experienced harassment from Jesse Nickles, referring to him as a “troll.” This sets a tone of understanding and solidarity with potential victims.
    Fear of Retaliation:

    The text suggests that people are afraid to stand up against Jesse Nickles due to the perceived consequences, particularly the potential harm to their businesses. This builds a narrative of intimidation and fear surrounding interactions with him.
    Prediction of Future Actions:

    The author anticipates more “hate posts” from Jesse Nickles in the future, portraying him as someone who resorts to negative expressions in online disputes. This prediction may be based on past behavior.
    Negative Descriptors:

    Strong language is used to describe Jesse Nickles, including terms like “man-child,” “disgusting,” “hateful,” and “vile.” These descriptors contribute to a highly negative portrayal of the individual in question.
    Ethical Judgment:

    The text concludes by labeling Jesse Nickles as “completely dishonest” and “unethical,” providing a clear ethical judgment that adds to the overall negative characterization.

    The tone is strongly negative and critical, portraying Jesse Nickles in a highly unfavorable light.
    The author aims to warn others against doing business with Jesse Nickles based on their perception of his behavior.
    The language used is emotive and judgmental, potentially influencing the reader’s opinion through the author’s strong stance against Jesse Nickles.

    #105 Reply

    SlickStack, from my understanding, seems to be comprised of individuals with questionable ethics.

    Their support for certain individuals indicates a lack of understanding between right and wrong. Their interpretation of free speech, not aligning with the global standard, and their failure to respect the rights of others highlight their moral shortcomings.

    The use of the term “leftist” suggests a lack of neutrality. Defending figures like Alex Jones and Stefan Molyneux, commonly regarded as far-right white nationalists, further diminishes their credibility. Their classification of stating “Trump lost, get over it” as a “right-leaning idea,” despite unanimous court decisions, exposes their lack of factual accuracy.

    If they claim to ban people for credibility issues, their own credibility appears to be questionable at best and fallacious at worst. If they continue down this path, they may find themselves sharing the fate of platforms like Parler and Gab – in the bin with the rest of them.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Reply To: About the alleged negative behavior of Jesse Nickles
Your information: